Subject	"about us" works fine for me on 800x600....
Posted by	Furious(Houston) on January 10, 2003 at 1:55 PM
	This message has been viewed 26 times.
In Reply To	it's impossible to even read the about us page. posted by niXit on January 10, 2003 at 01:47 PM
Message	and works fine at 1400 as well. I do have a problem reading the tire manufacturers @ 800 tho. "And Shepherds we shall be, for Thee my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand that our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. We shall flow a river forth unto Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In nomine Patris, et Fili, et Spiritu Sancti." ----The Boondock Saints
Follow Ups	SZR: Tear me a New One TT.net!!! - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 12:57:09 01/10/03 function over form (n/m) - Halo Z 13:13:47 01/10/03 Could you elaborate? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 13:20:03 01/10/03 it's... - niXit 13:36:57 01/10/03 What resolution are you on? Thanks for comments =). (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 15:59:30 01/10/03 from what i could see it looked clean. but - Halo Z 13:49:29 01/10/03 I agree. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 15:59:50 01/10/03 But that's...aaahh nevermind. (n/m) - JRH(KY) 13:29:49 01/10/03 hmmm....let me see...you need... - Datzun 13:27:21 01/10/03 Personally I don't like opening graphics...usually a waste - hoss 13:31:53 01/10/03 imgaine, your 189 hits on tt.net with opening graphics?? - six3077 13:35:27 01/10/03 umm...bad spelling, grammar, etc (n/m) - Furious(Houston) 13:34:07 01/10/03 I copied and pasted text. I'll proof-read and edit. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:00:36 01/10/03 everythings too small. pictures of tires, etc. - niXit 13:40:35 01/10/03 it's impossible to even read the about us page. - niXit 13:47:05 01/10/03 "about us" works fine for me on 800x600.... - Furious(Houston) 13:55:05 01/10/03 for me, its a very tiny grey blur box (scrollable!). (n/m) - niXit 13:56:02 01/10/03 hahaha - check it>>>. - Furious(Houston) 13:57:26 01/10/03 I'll work on the text size. Thanks. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:02:02 01/10/03 Re: Nice, but I would ad a little more graphics to it. >> - nemesiZ(Dallas) 13:57:52 01/10/03 yea, I'd rather download 3 megs of graphics then get data :\ (n/m) - niXit 14:03:33 01/10/03 Re: yea, I'd rather download 3 megs of graphics then get data :\ - nemesiZ(Dallas) 14:07:14 01/10/03 weak dude....so, so, weak...man.... (n/m) - Furious(Houston) 14:12:15 01/10/03 It will have sizes, prices, and application guide. Not done. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:03:24 01/10/03 It will have prices when finished. Not complete. (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:02:42 01/10/03 FAQ needs a serious proofreading. (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 14:17:23 01/10/03 try avoiding scroll bars - Playboy 14:53:43 01/10/03 Should be dialup friendly... any dialup comments? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:04:41 01/10/03 "don't use flash". that'll make it very dialup friendly. (n/m) - niXit 16:08:56 01/10/03 Compare the file sizes: - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:15:42 01/10/03 No response? (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 17:53:33 01/10/03 Yah, that's big for dialup - NATAZ 18:53:42 01/10/03 I like it >> - DanZMan 14:55:24 01/10/03 Penetration level, lol - Marshall 16:26:13 01/10/03 Don't believe it? Read the white paper. - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:31:12 01/10/03 I didn't say that - Marshall 16:33:47 01/10/03 Conflict of interest... I know ;). (n/m) - Kenny (9 psi TT + NA) 16:47:24 01/10/03 yeah, exactly. (n/m) - Marshall 17:00:27 01/10/03 That white paper didn't explain much, btw. - Marshall 16:44:04 01/10/03 Site looks fine, loads quick so far, not sure about the name - kandy2dr 18:20:36 01/10/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.